Scott Alexander, curated
← Back to curation

ACX Grants Followup Impact Market

Quality
56
Solid
Claude Shift
32
Slight
RWI
2
of 10

Summary

An operational followup launching the ACX Grants 2024 impact market on Manifund: explains the mechanism (investors crowdfund rejected proposals; philanthropists later buy back successful ones' impact certificates, potentially at a profit), notes the two compromises this round (only 44 of ~140 qualified applicants completed onboarding; the SEC workaround means payouts come as charity-only 'Manifund dollars' rather than cash), samples a few interesting rejected projects, and enumerates the risks and benefits with a clear worked toy example (the Norway animal-rights-law certificate).

Why this score

Quality 56 · Solid. Solid, upper: mostly promotional/operational, but it teaches the impact-certificate mechanism clearly with a concrete worked example and an honest risk list, giving it a bit more substance than a bare update. 56.

Claude’s paradigm shift 32 · Slight. Slight: an implementation update on an already-introduced mechanism; little novelty in itself. 32.

Real-world impact 2 · Minor. A live grantmaking mechanism on Manifund with five EA-fund partners that actually moved charitable money to projects; modest concrete spillover. RWI 2.