Scott Alexander, curated
← Back to curation

Book Review: The White King Of La Gonave

Quality
70
Strong
Claude Shift
42
Moderate
RWI
1
of 10

Summary

A review of Faustin Wirkus's 1931 memoir. Wirkus — born Palestine Wirkus to Polish immigrants in Pennsylvania, renamed to something more normal, and desperate enough to escape the coal mines that he joined the Marines without knowing where Haiti was — arrived as part of the US occupation. Scott supplies the background the memoir lacks: French colonization from 1625, the 1791 slave revolt, the crushing indemnity, American bankers who either feared for their loans or used that fear as a pretext, drift toward the German sphere, and the 1915 crisis in which a paranoid president murdered a hundred hostages and was torn apart by a mob, prompting the occupation. Wirkus's first impressions of Port-au-Prince are quoted at length and are exactly as ugly as expected. Posted to the countryside, he became one of the soldier-administrators the occupation ran on — a young Marine given a squad of gendarmes and authority over several villages, a job that broke many of his peers — and turned out to be unusually good at it, learning Creole, hunting Cacos guerrillas with enthusiasm, and acquiring a reputation for sorcery by building a chimney that did not fill the house with smoke. A cockfighting con, in which he plays the ignorant foreigner and takes the villagers' money, is noted by Scott as probably indefensible and nonetheless the foundation of his local reputation as a savvy operator. The second act is La Gonave, the island no previous governor had set foot on. Wirkus meets its imprisoned Queen, Ti Memenne, arrested for insulting a tax collector; she becomes interested on learning his first name is Faustin, that of the last Emperor of Haiti. He secures her clemency and returns to find not the malarial wasteland of mainland rumour but old-growth rainforest, rich virgin farmland, and conspicuously neat whitewashed villages — a report his colleagues refuse to believe, needling him about the Sacred Alligator that earlier functionaries had reported and that Wirkus concludes was invented, possibly by the islanders themselves as a deterrent. He fires the corrupt tax collectors, introduces high-yield crops and mosquito nets (one headman offers his fifteen-year-old daughter for one), and documents the Congo Societies — part secret society, part labour union, rotating obligatory work parties on a ritual schedule, dispensing justice chiefly for insufficient contribution, each with a queen and Ti Memenne the Queen of Queens. Judging him the reincarnation of Faustin Soulouque, the island crowns him co-monarch, and he rules three years before Port-au-Prince notices, takes offence, and recalls him in 1929; the Marine brass suspected he was going native or insane. Part III asks what can be learned. Wirkus's implied challenge is that if La Gonave worked, mainland failure cannot be innate or geographic — so what was the recipe? His first answer is a less extractive elite, and Scott adds the speculation that an agrarian island of 12,000 simply offers less to extract than a partly-urbanised country of millions, connecting it to the familiar finding that stateless peasant villages are poor but relatively egalitarian: the social fabric slavery destroyed could be rebuilt somewhere small and isolated, not somewhere large and permanently interfered with. The second is the redemptive power of work — Wirkus repeatedly banned some petty crime, arrested enough people to form a labour gang, set them to public works, and found they seemed to end up better off, which Scott flags as exactly what a man assuaging his conscience would report while noting its consistency and detail; the implied theory is that Haitian incentives were so extractive that nobody sane would work, and an outsider could break the cycle. Two closing facts about the sequel: loggers took the old-growth forest in the mid-twentieth century, and two Americans were recently convicted of conspiring to raise a mercenary army from the DC homeless population, seize La Gonave, and enslave its inhabitants.

Why this score

Quality 70 · Strong. Strong. Excellent material, well chosen and well paced — the Wirkus story is genuinely extraordinary and the review earns its length through quotation rather than summary, with Scott doing the historical scaffolding the memoir omits. The analytical third act is real work: the extraction-capacity argument is a plausible and specific answer to the question the book raises but cannot answer, and the honest handling of the work-gang evidence (stating the obvious bias, then explaining why he still partly credits it) is the review's best epistemic moment. Held in the middle of Strong because the analysis is brief and admittedly speculative next to a long narrative, the underlying framework is imported rather than developed, and the book is a minor curiosity — this is a superb telling of a good story with a decent thesis attached, not a piece that reorganises how anyone thinks about development.

Claude’s paradigm shift 42 · Moderate. Moderate. Extractive elites as the engine of national failure is standard institutional economics, and the small-scale-egalitarian-village observation is a recurring theme of Scott's own reviews rather than a new one. The novelty is in the material — an obscure 1931 memoir almost nobody has read, surfaced with its central puzzle intact — and in the specific extraction-capacity refinement, not in the frame.

Real-world impact 1 · Negligible. Negligible. A paid review of a forgotten memoir about an island of 12,000 people, read by a subscriber subset of one blog. Whatever influence it has is confined to how a few thousand readers think about a historical curiosity.