When Truth Isn't Enough
Read the original on LessWrong →
Summary
On the gap between denotation and connotation in loaded statements. 'The ultra-rich spend their time at cocktail parties while millions starve' is denotationally true (everyone from Milton Friedman down agrees) yet carries an anti-capitalist connotation that the literal reduction misses — and the danger is letting such trivially-true statements quietly buttress a belief system. Illustrated with the Connotation Game ('I am intelligent / you are clever / he's an egghead'; 'I care about the poor / you're pro-welfare / he's a bleeding-heart'). The practical tool: when faced with a true-but-loaded claim, don't flounder denying the denotation — say 'I agree denotationally but object connotationally; state the connotation explicitly and I'll explain why it's wrong,' which Scott dubs ADBOC.
Why this score
Quality 72 · Strong. Strong (lower). A clear, useful little essay that names a real rhetorical trap and supplies a handy, somewhat-exported tool (ADBOC) for it. Held at 72 by brevity (~950 words) and narrow scope. 72.
Claude’s paradigm shift 45 · Moderate. Moderate. Denotation/connotation is old linguistics/philosophy; the ADBOC framing is a modest fresh tool. 45.
Real-world impact 2 · Minor. Names a real rhetorical trap (denotationally-true statements that smuggle a loaded connotation) and supplies a handy, somewhat-exported tool (ADBOC) plus the Connotation Game. Conceptual influence within rationalist discourse, brief and narrow, no material change — low RWI.