Someone Writes An Anti-Racist FAQ

A short link/appreciation post praising The Prussian's 'Anti-Racialist Q&A' (inspired by Scott's own Anti-Reactionary FAQ). Scott's angle: it's astounding because it's the first thing he's read that actually ARGUES against racism (rather than just condemning/accusing it), in a persuasive 'I see where you're coming from, but have you considered X?' style — an impressive signal of epistemic virtue. Directs discussion to Prussian's site.

Quality 55 · Solid. Solid: a brief link/endorsement post lifted above a bare linkpost by the genuine arguing-against-vs-condemning observation, but short and mostly pointing elsewhere. 55.

Claude’s paradigm shift 36 · Slight. The arguing-vs-condemning meta-point is a mild novelty. B36.

Real-world impact 1 · Negligible. A linkpost driving traffic elsewhere; trivial reach. RWI1.