Scott Alexander, curated
← Back to curation

Book Review: Inventing The Future

Quality
79
Excellent
Claude Shift
55
Moderate
RWI
3
of 10

Summary

Review of Srnicek & Williams' left-accelerationist manifesto (full automation + UBI + reduced work week + diminished work ethic). Covers their critique of 'folk politics' (prefiguration; symbolic protest; 'no demands' as faux-radicalism) and their novel claim that leftist groups fail because they apply communist principles to their own organizing; their Mont Pelerin Society model (Hayek's long game: cultivate talent, win academia, push a utopian vision + practical steps, be ready when crisis hits) as the 'counter-hegemonic' alternative. Scott's sharp critiques: the platform is over-dependent on UBI (3/4 of it alone would be dystopia; UBI would produce the rest); automation isn't intrinsically good (workers keep bargaining power); the 'please don't throw me in the briar patch' jab at their 'UBI ironically gives libertarians their world.' The standout original insight: the active ingredient of Mont Pelerin / Fabian / EA success is HAVING A GOOD IDEA -- one the smartest people conclude is true after reasoned debate, so they join you (vs S&W's 'myth of rational political discourse'). Closes: utopianism is alive everywhere (de Grey, Seasteading, Musk, singularity, Altman's UBI pilot) -- 'except on the left.'

Why this score

Quality 79 · Excellent. A rich, fair, idea-dense political review that genuinely tries to understand the communist paradigm, with multiple original syntheses (the 'good ideas attract talent -> institutional capture' analysis; the UBI-is-load-bearing critique; the utopianism close). At the top of his book-review range. High-Excellent.

Claude’s paradigm shift 55 · Moderate. Low-Major-shift. The book's ideas aren't Scott's, but his Mont-Pelerin 'active ingredient' analysis and the platform critique are a fresh, exported contribution.

Real-world impact 3 · Moderate. A rich, idea-dense political review with multiple original syntheses (good-ideas-attract-talent → institutional capture; the UBI-is-load-bearing critique). Conceptual influence within intellectual discourse, no material change — modest RWI.