Highlights From The Comments On PNSE
Read the original on Slate Star Codex →
Summary
A 'Highlights From The Comments' companion to his PNSE (Persistent Non-Symbolic Experience / enlightenment) review, elevated above a bare roundup by Scott's substantive interspersed responses. Against a commenter's hardline falsifiability demand (enlightenment must yield clairvoyance or it's cargo-cult nonsense), Scott gives a genuinely good Bayesian defense of taking the reports seriously: his prior on euphoric depersonalized states is high precisely because dysphoric depersonalization is medically real; thousands of otherwise-trustworthy people (some he knows) describe it similarly, back it with behavior change and brain scans, and it meshes with Dennett/Parfit on the self-as-construct -- so dismissing it would be like believing LSD causes only 'placebo hallucinations' or that chronic pain is 'placebo pain.' The Komodo-dragon reframe (doubt dissolves if you call enlightenment 'euphoric depersonalization' rather than 'glowy superhuman'). He also airs strong steelmen from the comments: Bill Joslin's view that meditation traditions manufacture unnecessarily dramatic versions of insights ordinary people stumble into 'walking in the woods' (and the 6%-of-SSC-readers-enlightened survey result minus Lizardman's 4%); Aella's gossip that Jeffrey Martin cherry-picks; and Cuke's 35-year-Buddhist account that real progress shows up as irreversible reduced emotional reactivity others would notice. Substantive for a comments post, but dependent on the parent.
Why this score
Quality 65 · Strong. Low-Strong (65): a comments-companion lifted by Scott's genuinely good Bayesian-priors argument for crediting unusual-experience reports (and the Komodo-dragon reframe), plus high-quality curated steelmen. Held in the low-Strong band, and flagged as a companion, because it depends on the parent PNSE post and is largely framed around others' comments.
Claude’s paradigm shift 42 · Moderate. Moderate (42): the Bayesian defense of taking enlightenment reports seriously and the reframing-via-naming move are nice applications rather than novel ideas; much of the value is curatorial.
Real-world impact 2 · Minor. A comments-companion lifted by Scott's Bayesian-priors defense of crediting unusual-experience reports; depends on the parent post, discourse-internal, no material reach → RWI 2.