Scott Alexander, curated
← Back to curation

Thoughts On The Divorce Discourse

Quality
68
Strong
Claude Shift
52
Moderate
RWI
1
of 10
Humor level 1 badge: Lizardman’s ConstantHumorLizardman’s Constantstatistical noise

Summary

An ethics essay on the bindingness of oaths: communal vows (Bar Mitzvah, Hippocratic Oath, the Bodhisattva Vow) are routinely taken without meaning them, so it's perverse to treat marriage vows as the one oath that must mean exactly what it says. Builds two original mechanisms — Raikoth's oath-discharge temple you must climb barefoot ('skilled mountaineers are inherently untrustworthy') as a cap on how bad oaths can get, and a d10-euthanasia protocol that removes social pressure from irreversible choices — and carves out the GWWC Pledge as a genuinely-meant exception.

Why this score

Quality 68 · Strong. Strong, high: a substantive, original piece of applied moral philosophy — the mountain-discharge and d10 mechanisms are memorable, generative devices for thinking about commitment and irreversibility, and the argument is clean. Among the best Tumblr essays. 68.

Claude’s paradigm shift 52 · Moderate. Moderate/Notable edge: the calibrated-cost oath-discharge idea and the framing of irreversible-decision gravity are fresh contributions. 52.

Real-world impact 1 · Negligible. An ethics musing; no material reach. RWI 1.

Humor 1/5 · Lizardman’s Constant. Gate at 1 (Lizardman): mostly serious, with the wry 'mountaineers are untrustworthy' implication as a genuine but incidental laugh. 1.